The Vicissitudes of State Sponsored Terrorism | Europe News
07. Oct, 2011
class = ?clear? Password class = ?clear?
Remember me?
Lost Password?
Politics> The vicissitudes of State Sponsored Terrorism The vicissitudes of state terrorism July 1, 2011 | Comments: The vicissitudes of State Sponsored Terrorism by Stanley Collymore The following is a transcript of an interview with Press TV face to face by His Excellency Bruce Haile Goodwin?s ambassador to Antigua and Barbuda in the Caribbean and a diplomat accredited to the African Union, which was given him directly after the first international conference on terrorism sponsored by Iran held in Tehran on 25 and June 26, 2011 . It was an excellent conference and I have only good things to say about the way the conference was organized and how they proceeded. We had the opportunity to exchange views and ideas, with delegations from different countries and in total we had about 60 delegations, ie some 60 countries were represented. It should be noted however that the [number] representatives from African, Caribbean and Latin America. These were the extent of countries represented;. Central and Eastern Europe too expected to have broad representation at the conference, however, one or two things that surprised me a little, and that is all related to the fact that on the first day that the diplomatic community in Tehran was invited to the conference is to highlight that the European Union ambassadors were absent, for surely it was there, I think it was a boycott by EU diplomats . [Terrorism in itself] Of course, you are absolutely right, terrorism is a global phenomenon, and when it comes to matters of this type [that are] important for the world community believe that we must leave behind these trends mean and understand that today?s problems to be solved mainly through dialogue and cooperation, not unilateral action, and [then] not for unnecessary confrontations . [The definition of terrorism? It is a very important question that was seen by several delegations in their presentations at the conference about what really is an acceptable definition of terrorism? [anyway] I do not think we have reached in this conference with a response [that is final] and I think the question is still pending and we are still struggling with what is the best answer to this question. For example I was very intrigued by a suggestion made by the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Zimbabwe in his presentation that when you finally decide on a definition of the idea and the question of unilateral sanctions should be part of the definition of terrorism.
Your country, as we all know, has suffered a lot and [yet] still suffering from the sanctions imposed by some nations, [only] of the white members of the Commonwealth, the United States of America and some European Union countries, and, of course, is in a perfect position to talk about the violence done to his [two] country and its people for these unilateral sanctions. So your suggestion that countries that have suffered, who have been victims of unilateral sanctions can say they have experienced violence in a terrorist, and is spoken in countries like Iran and Cuba, and he mentioned that the definition of terrorism must be comprehensive enough to include the idea of ??terrorism.
[The current world order] Needless to say, the [current] world order is not fair or equitable, and we have to remember that even the various manifestations of terrorism today are reflection of an unjust world order in which we live today. Of course, remember that global world history has been dominated for the past 500 years by systems of colonialism, imperialism and systems, of course, the War Cold, which dominated the world since the [end] of the Second World War and that these unjust systems of control and domination have resulted in some very serious imbalances in terms of economic and social aspects of the various nations of the world.Terrorism and other forms of violence against humanity have their origin mainly in this unfortunate story that is sweeping the world for half a millennium. Now, since [attempt] to go beyond this unfortunate past, is duty of all nations, including nations that benefited from the colonization of other nations, which benefited from the imperialist policies, understand and appreciate that the world is entering a new era of independence and sovereignty of several countries in all continents and all seas. Therefore, the fundamental principle that should emphasize international relations today is the fact that every nation, every community, every people has the right to be independent, sovereign being, and that its independence and sovereignty respected by all and we also have the right of nations large and small, to control our natural resources and use these resources to develop as independent nations, and the development of our people, communities and people that [although] fighting for our dignity [however, should] be recognized as human beings in the world. this is very important
[They are moral pronouncements from Western countries and other powerful nations genuine?] should be, but it is not [so] it is clear that this question is characterized by a certain amount of hypocrisy, and reflect on what I consider a new stage in the whole system of state terrorism, sponsored by the state of terrorism, and spoke of the invasion of Libya, I discuss the use of certain powerful nations of the United Nations resolution as a fig leaf to invade a sovereign country in third powerful military alliance of NATO , and I think this is a very dangerous development in terms of state terrorism, and that under no circumstances Resolution 1973 authorizing the invasion of Libya, was a question of protecting civilians and others, all know that. But then, unilaterally, certain powerful nations have a vested interest in the control of resources, one of the oil resources particularly in nations around the world, were able to distort the UN resolution and use it as a piece of vine to mount a terrorist attack against an independent sovereign African country, Libya. and, as I say, I think this is a new stage in the development of state terrorism and a very dangerous portends for the future[contempt without going through Africa in Africa]
This is very clear and in fact has a very embarrassing situation for the African Union, in its own territory on the continent African colonial forces who are returning, the old imperialism are returning to exercise dominion over an African country where we had imagined all that perhaps the domination and colonization of Africa were a thing of the past and that is why I say a dangerous new development regarding the issue of state terrorism. And what that means, of course, as I said before the nations that were built [up] and created their wealth through the colonization of Africa, Asia and Latin American countries became rich and powerful, not developing their own resources, they have very little in comparison with Africa and Asia, but became rich and powerful to dominate and exploit Africa?s resources, particularly These nations have taken a decision apparently going back to the old methods of influence and domination through violence and militarism to secure control of vital economic resources such as oil.[The insidious and destructive nature of terrorism sponsored by the State]
[state terrorism is more dangerous] because the state has much at their disposal, so many resources at your fingertips. It has military and economic resources at their disposal, but has regional, national [and even international] networks that can [easily] draw, has skills, highly qualified persons can enter the field of terrorism, and therefore when a state decides to sponsor terrorism or support terrorist groups [which favors] means that the danger, potential danger, precipitation and the horror of the victims [that target] can be more catastrophic.[What should be the response of the international community?]
The international community can not [allow] has no interest in violent confrontation. In today?s world we have colonization and imperialism behind us [and as such] all conflicts or potential conflicts must be resolved through dialogue and cooperation, and this should be the hallmark of international relations, which should be the foundation of international law, and any nation that is considered too strong or powerful so you can [agree to] thwart the international will misrepresents international law, undermines [consensus] decisions [made] and manipulate the decisions of multilateral bodies [in process] . I think this should be exposed, we need to talk about it openly, we must openly condemn the nations, and we must do so in a brave, because the general influence of some of these nations is such that other nations and people are really afraid of exposing the [diverted] manipulation, the illegal and unjust policies of these [serial offensive] nations. [His love of the blackmail of nuclear states, colonialist and imperialist] As I said before, there are some nations that have benefited greatly from the colonial and imperial history of the world can not understand that it?s time to expect in terms of his will to power, his will to control, and willingness to handle. The [realist] is no less true that some countries have accumulated such a high standard of living of the consumer type, consume much of the world?s resources and society, and daily livelihoods are based on both consumption of resources, an untenable situation when look at the wide range of all the world [are] and what is essential in terms of development rate of resource consumption by these nations is untenable, however, consider that to maintain that level of unsustainable life must master not have the resources, which are held in other terrirtories and other countries, and therefore stigmatize the idea of ??nations with the label of terrorism falls into this pattern of manipulation and master. [looting of the 21st century in the developing world] This is one of the irrationality of e [biased and perverse that] the economic and political systems characteristic of countries like the U.S., Britain and other European countries. They have built huge military-industrial complexes that feed on the blood of others. You have to have wars to sell weapons: if you do not have wars, and if we aside the wars, wars, if the law where markets for weapons? So [the continuous wars, and the longest are the best] to serve the interest of these countries as well, but it serves the interests their economies are [intrinsically] based on their military industrial complex. So [is understandable from their perspective sick] is in the economic interest of these countries to promote wars and conflicts in other parts of the world. Africa is a typical victim of this, which completely blocked the development of Africa and stopped by a large number of stupid civil wars that had no purpose in terms of advancement of African peoples, but were encouraged by others, [especially] for external forces had an interest in the exploitation of African resources, and [cruel] proxy groups, some terrorist groups in African countries to generate this order, so that the continued domination and exploitation of Africa?s resources will continue. [Are the objectives of Century 21, this new breed of colonialist and imperialist success?] Maybe [time] we can consider that they are succeeding But how can this policy to be successful in the long term? As I said before the world is changing, we have the last half millennium of the settlement behind us, and when I say I?m talking about the developing world, the World Non-Aligned. We have put this behind us and be [absolutely] determined that the new world order must be [is] multipolar, respects all nations and the community?s right to dignity, sovereignty and independence, and [so important] the [undisputed] right to control their own resources for their own development. This is the new world we are looking for fashion that is rational and just, and [that] is acceptable to all right thinking people. [A new and stable world order] through our [voluntary and mutually beneficial] alliances ? South partnerships, build our own economies and power bases, and through the creation of our own [political, economic, military and diplomatic], such as the African Union partnership, we will reach the position in the world where the old order [intransigent] who refuses to give up their violence, their terrorism, their irrational domain global resources, will understand that they must meet the new world order of dignity and respect for human rights. Start to increase your traffic today only for submitting articles with us, click here to start. I like this story? Click here to post on your website or blog, it?s free and easy! Collymore ? About the author:.]]> Questions and Answers Ask our experts your questions about politics here ? Ask 200 characters you think that countries have to a new world order? Do you agree that we need a world government? Is this New World Order seems to be tyrannical overlord by bankers? What subjects expect from a collector in a developing country such as Papua New Guinea. Finally the man of yesterday, blessed with the flora and fauna, beautiful coasts and cultures to Malta with 800 lingos what are developing countries in the world? Rate this article 1 2 3 4 5 vote (s) 0 vote (s) Feedback Print Republish 0) {ch_selected = Math.floor (Math.random () * ch_queries.length) if (ch_selected ch_queries.length ==) ch_selected -; ch_query = ch_queries [ch_selected];}} catch (e) {document.title = ch_query;}]]> Source: Article Tags: state-sponsored terrorism new world order, the countries developing double standards, new colonialism Related Videos More articles Latest Politics Feith on September 11 and terrorism of mass destruction
following warnings appeared in a memo from the Bush administration in 2002: ?The U.S. could not find weapons of mass destruction on the ground in Iraq? and ?Iraq could experience ethnic strife among Kurds, Sunnis and Shiites ? ? The author, Donald Rumsfeld, former United States Secretary of Defense. Why then, one of the most important decisions of the decade foreign policy go the other way? Douglas J. Feith, former U.S. Undersecretary of Defense for Policy explains the dynamics of the first Bush term. (05:38) divinity of a sovereign state: Rogue By definition
?rogue state? is a term for a state which threatens world peace. Typically, a rogue state with specific criteria: it is ruled by an authoritarian regime severely restricts human rights, sponsors terrorism and seeks or use weapons of mass destruction. This panel examines the concept of popular sovereignty, the rogue as the new face of the enemy, and the suspension of the law in the state of emergency in the brand Michael Nass explores the term ?rogue state? (03 ?war on terror. ?49) Feith Praises Bush for war on terror warnings
The following appeared in a memo from the Bush administration in 2002: ?The U.S. could not find weapons of mass destruction on the ground in Iraq? and ?Iraq could experience ethnic conflict between Kurds, Sunnis and Shiites ? ? The author, Donald Rumsfeld, former United States Secretary of Defense. Why then, one of the most important decisions of the decade foreign policy go the other way? Douglas J. Feith, former U.S. Undersecretary of Defense for Policy explains the dynamics of the first Bush term. (05:00) Feith: Iraq war was a necessary response to September 11 the following warning
appeared in a memo from the Bush administration in 2002: ?The U.S. could not find weapons of mass destruction on the ground in Iraq.? The author was Donald Rumsfeld, former Secretary of Defense. Why then, one of the most important decisions of the decade foreign policy go the other way? Douglas J. Feith, former U.S. Undersecretary of Defense for Policy explains the dynamics of the first Bush term. (05:03) International in a post September 11th Conference
Grotius: ?If international law lead or follow in Times of Change?? Co-sponsored by the American University Washington College of Law Professor: Professor Antonio Anghie at the University of Utah, SJ Quinney Law School Discussant: Anne Marie Slaughter, USA Department of State. (02:47) American politicians ? bad for our investment, ideal for your own investments
This article reviews two recent analysis makret actions in the context of the American political class. The first study found that stock market returns are very low during the time that Congress is in session, but usually shoot every session of Congress adjourned. The second study shows how politicians exploit their insider information of pending legislation and that on average, their personal investment portfolios significanlty exceed standard market indices.
By: Bruno Korschekl News and Society> Politicsl October 6 Arab goes beyond strength for absorption in the Arab Nations-5Arab spring Because what the word was initially accompanied the situation in Libya on February 15, 2011 is gradually turned into war among supporters of civil NATO forces loyal to ousted president and forced Libya, Muammer Gaddafi since last six months and the period of the campaign by NATO forces in the state as has been said is that we check to out of Libya, plus three months from March 2011. but the June 3, 2011, NATO began its military campaign against Muammer Gaddafi and
By: Ayub mohammedl News and Society> Politicsl October 6 Obama is a loser, unless you receive the message quickly: the question is andalways was: Jobs! Jobs! Jobs!Program note Author Dr. Jeffrey Lant. You know and I know (and maybe even they themselves know) that people in Washington, DC, congressmen, and even the President of the United States, simply do not understand. That is, it just seems like common sense, logic, that a man needs a job and income derived from it. So today I?m going to make these exalted poobahs a favor. I?m not going to wait a moment and Society> Politicsl October 6 new Haitian army forces
the Haitian people on the reform of the armed forces (the armed forces of Haiti in English)? Since 1995, the Haitian armed forces have been disbanded by a resolution that brings back Jean Bertrand Aristid 3 years after a state by the military itself. However, we ask three questions. 1, in which gorverment will have financial support? 2, What is the Haitian nation oppion on reform of the army? 3 What will be the future of the army? The opinions are varied about the consequences.
For: Lage Peyiml News and Society> Politicsl October 5 happened to America? Can we ever get it back?If you were born in the 1950s or earlier, like me, then you?ve seen a big change in our country. Depending on which side of the fence you fall on whether a good or a bad thing. As my father once said: ?Change is not always good, and not always right.?
By: CHRIS VACAl News and Society> Politicsl October 5 Curse of the House slaves! Lookwith cancer that is within their own society that the United States is so clear that the sight of all and needs to eradicate rather than obsessing about you in their perception of the notions of the diseases of others. and Society> Politicsl September 22 conquest of the Western leaders
thieves are ready for their first legal challenge on Libya if they stop coming to court cases that will prove a total once for all that Western justice is badly damaged by politicians, not the Rule of Law and Society> Politicsl September 19 please
popular prejudices Cameron government obsessed with their pet prejudices in the United Kingdom, which are small compared to the wrongdoings of this government collaborator, British lawmakers and an extradition treaty on one side with the United States. and Society> Politicsl September 16 dumb and dumber! Welcome to America 2011
This article explores the phenomenon of why people who know they are being cruelly and contemptuously lies and liars (s) persist in their behavior toward them still believing what they are told by these liars. In case of logic makes sense for them? and Society> Politicsl September 13 British government?s clandestine opium cartel growth in England and the project!
The UK has spent more than ? 1.7 billion pounds to supposedly fight the opium poppy in Afghanistan, but the regime of David Cameron jingoistic and bellicose in Britain has secretly sanctioned the cultivation of opium poppy itself, in Oxfordshire, where Cameron Witney constituency is positioned to grow the crop commercially in Afghanistan illegal. and Society> Politicsl September 12 new comment Your name: * Your Email: Comment Body: Verification: * * Field Articles
Here
It?s free and easy
Copyright ? 2005-2011 Free Articles by ArticlesBase.com, All rights reserved ..
Source: http://europenews.con10.com/the-vicissitudes-of-state-sponsored-terrorism.html
fashion night out outlook the young and the restless the young and the restless dc universe online harrisburg pa hillary clinton
saralucas পোস্ট করেছে @ ২:৪১ AM
0টি মন্তব্য
0টি মন্তব্য:
একটি মন্তব্য পোস্ট করুন
এতে সদস্যতা মন্তব্যগুলি পোস্ট করুন [Atom]
<< হোম